In the five days I am spending in Arizona, Donald Trump, Hillary
Clinton and Mike
Pence have or will (tomorrow) appear in this newest of swing states. Tim
Kaine will be here on Thursday and Donald
Trump Jr. on Friday. It’s a strange state of affairs for a state that has
been solidly red and the Arizona Republic, the state’s primary newspaper, has
been in the center of the firestorm.
It started with the Republic’s endorsement
of Hillary Clinton, the first Democrat to be endorsed in the paper’s 126 year
history. The endorsement generated a lot of criticism and news
coverage, and in this piece,
an insightful discussion about the role of editorial boards vs. reporters. (This
honest piece
responding to the criticism is simply amazing. It draws on our common humanity,
a theme that is woefully absent from politics.)
Today, the Republic issued an editorial
criticizing James Comey’s decision to publicize additional investigations into
Clinton’s emails. “Comey had no idea when he sent his letter to Congress
whether there was anything the public needed to know. [He] interjected himself
recklessly into the presidential race.”
The editors will undoubtedly receive criticism for this
opinion as well. But I have to give them kudos for being fair. The more that is
revealed about Comey’s decision the more irresponsible it seems. In the words
of the editorial: “Comey offered no substance, no evidence. There’s only the
suggestion of new scandal, which means Clinton can offer no defense.”
The suggestion of an investigation feeds into Trump – and
the alt right’s – larger narrative about Clinton’s emails as the “biggest
scandal since Watergate.” The question is whether undecided voters – the ones
who matter right now – really buy it. Given the significant election
fatigue, I highly doubt it. It’s simply additional fodder for Trump
supporters – like the woman I sat next to on the plane who told me, “I like
going to strip clubs, why shouldn’t Donald Trump?”
No comments:
Post a Comment