It’s millennial week, according
to the Guardian.
A week where Hillary Clinton turned up the heat on millennial voters,
inviting this generally skeptical
generation into the big tent.
She’s got Twitter, and Facebook, Snapchat
and Instagram,
but Team Clinton doesn’t have the support
it would like to see. Clinton is not the fiery Bernie Sanders; instead she is
seen as a boring, conventional second choice.
Here’s why:
We are
living in an age that is the product of austerity measures, deregulation,
skyrocketing student-loan debt, high unemployment and a lack of affordable
housing…So when a disheveled old white dude comes along and says our society is
rigged for the rich, perpetual warfare is not the answer, and people of color
should not be slaughtered by the police…you’re damn right we’re going to stand
with him. (TIME)
Clinton is failing to engage
millennials.
They rallied around Obama, a
candidate who evoked response through evocative language; a candidate that received
their first presidential vote as they came of age. “Hope” and “Change we can
count on” became a rallying cry for a new order, a better system. They are looking
for that same emotional engagement from the next candidate.
Clinton is not Barack Obama. She comes
across as awkward, stilted and scripted. Millennials, who value authenticity
and candidness, have a hard time connecting with someone who is criticized
about her honesty and trustworthiness.
On the Politics for Humans podcast,
John Favreau, a millennial himself, says that his generation responds to
informal, conversational speech. Obama
was a natural at this; Clinton is continuing to improve. She needs to “meet
them where they are and speak to them where they are. Figure out where young
people are getting their news and information…Hillary Clinton needs to go on
those shows and go to colleges and speak to young voters.”
This week, she did just that.
Exhibit 1: Rally at Temple
She was honest
and authentic: “I also know that even if you are totally opposed to Donald
Trump, you still may have some questions about me. I get that.” She elucidated
the point that millennials overwhelming agree on: “We have to stand up to this
hate. We cannot let it go on.” And ended with a call to action: "The next
50 days will shape the next 50 years.”
Exhibit 2: Between Two Ferns (Watch it. It’s that good)
Clinton delivered deadpan answers
to Zach Galifianakis’ outrageous questions. She poked fun at herself, the media
and her critics. Most important, she parodied the very criticism levied against
her: that she is too scripted and robotic. Clinton comes across as funny and
likeable, with a dry sense of humor.
According to the Census Bureau, millennials are now the largest generation of voters in America. They matter and both candidates know it. (Donald Trump has been using the word “revolution” lately. Sound like another candidate we know?). There are two aspects to willing millennials: 1.) winning their support and 2.) getting them to the polls. Ideologically, millennials are Clinton’s votes to lose. She’s got to continue engaging them on their level in an authentic way. She was witty and likable on Between the Ferns.
She needs to do this more often.
According to the Census Bureau, millennials are now the largest generation of voters in America. They matter and both candidates know it. (Donald Trump has been using the word “revolution” lately. Sound like another candidate we know?). There are two aspects to willing millennials: 1.) winning their support and 2.) getting them to the polls. Ideologically, millennials are Clinton’s votes to lose. She’s got to continue engaging them on their level in an authentic way. She was witty and likable on Between the Ferns.
She needs to do this more often.
No comments:
Post a Comment