Was Donald Trump for the war in Iraq or wasn’t he? This
question has occupied the airwaves of late, since Wednesday’s forum when
moderator Matt Lauer was slammed
for his failure to question Donald Trump’s claims of opposition to the Iraq War.
The question comes down to an interpretation of statements
that Trump made before he was a politician. Chronicled in a detailed timeline
by FactCheck.org
(a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center) and the Washington
Post, the statements reveal a man who reflected the evolving feelings of
many at the time: early enthusiasm for the war and exhaustion as the occupation progressed.
Here are the facts:
No one has been able to find evidence that Donald Trump
opposed the Iraq war before the invasion - not FactCheck.org,
not PolitiFact
and not the WaPo
Fact Checker.
During this time, Trump made two statements that supported
the invasion: on the Howard Stern Show on Sept. 11, 2002 (conveniently
excerpted by BuzzFeed ) and in an interview with Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on
March 21 (another
BuzzFeed scoop).
The first inklings of doubt were seen in March
2003 and by 2004, Trump was well on the record as opposing
the invasion.
In Wednesday’s forum among other places, Trump claimed that
he always opposed the Iraq War and knew it would be disastrous for the Middle
East. Despite his insistence that he fought “very,
very hard” against going into Iraq, warning, “you’ll
destabilize the Middle East,” Trump has yet to provide the promised “25
stories” that prove this to be the case.
What’s up?
Donald Trump changed his opinion on the war, plain and
simple. Was he swayed by popular opinion or merely a reflection of the attitude
of the nation? We’ll never know and frankly, it doesn’t matter. That fact is…
he changed.
I can’t fault The Donald for changing his tune here. Many
politicians that supported the war – including Hillary Clinton - were sent
scrambling once the initial justification disappeared. Clinton changed her
opinion and has been open
about it. Trump cannot seem to do the same and this is what makes his
candidacy so alarming. Instead of acknowledging a learning process and
accepting his evolving views, he points his finger at the media, calling them dishonest,
liars.
In this instance he ought to “woman up” and follow Clinton’s
lead.
No comments:
Post a Comment